Is the current definition of ‘God’ just a conscious and judgemental version of the laws of physics?
Question by Purple Moogle: Is the current definition of ‘God’ just a conscious and judgemental version of the laws of physics?
Things people say, like “God is what keeps atoms together” or “Gravity is the active effect of God’s will” or stuff like that makes think that people are simply applying anthropomorphic consciousness to already affirmed physical laws.
Anyone agree or am I just drawing the wrong conclusion here?
Dunamis ~ I mean “current” in the way that modern, rational religious people would describe God.
Haha, nice one Tiara 
Misguided: back atcha, kupo~ :3
Best answer:
Answer by Dunamis
Whose definition of God? Muslim, Christian, Hindu, Jew…yours? It’s not your specific conclusion, it’s your generalized question.
Edit: “Rational,” by definition, is bias. Whose definition of “rational” are you using? Atheists and agnostics on this site consider Christians irrational, and visa-versa. Again, you generalize, and generalizations are a sign of confusion.
Add your own answer in the comments!
Related Blogs
- Google launches judgemental search engine | NewsBiscuit
- Answer to the Friday Puzzle….. « Richard Wiseman's Blog
- Nancy777 » Blog Archive » #WFJ: TOUCH MY PRESENCE AND MY DUNAMIS POWER
- “Ask Me A Question” – Justin Barcia and Trey Canard
- Does true science start with a conclusion and then an experiment to support it? | MoSo Technology
- Whose house is of glasse, must not throw stones at another. « jg's Ramblings
- Danger of Deflation Depends on Your Definition of Deflation
- Weighing up the merits of ‘non-judgemental’ ethics classes | ACL
- Qatar has questions to answer for 2022 World Cup | ASU News | The State Press | Arizona State University
- How can I find words by their definition?
